Exam Alert: SEC identifies concerns, good practices regarding nonpublic information

On September 27, 2012, the SEC identified situations ripe for abuse of inside information at broker-dealers so that industry professionals will know what to avoid. The SEC also provided examples of good policies put in place at some broker-dealers that minimize the risk of insider trading violations. Continue reading

On September 27, 2012, the SEC identified situations ripe for abuse of inside information at broker-dealers so that industry professionals will know what to avoid. The SEC also provided examples of good policies put in place at some broker-dealers that minimize the risk of insider trading violations.

 

Potentially problematic situations include the following:

-Lots of informal, undocumented interaction between departments with MNPI (material nonpublic information) and sales/trading departments that could abuse that information

-Having senior executives that supervise multiple departments and could spread MNPI from one department to another without oversight, due to being “above” the information barriers

-Lack of review of situations where MNPI is provided from one department to another for business purposes

-Lack of review of trading in customer and affiliate accounts

-Lack of review of situations where MNPI is received from an outside source

 

Effective practices included:

-Having a system that distinguishes MNPI based on source or type of information (possibly even having individualized reports specific to certain pieces of information)

-Expanded review of potential misuse of MNPI, including looking at trading in swaps, loans, components of pooled securities (such as UITs and ETFs), warrants, and bond options

-Monitoring access to electronic sources of MNPI to see which employees access the information

-Monitoring access levels granted via key cards and computer networks to ensure that only authorized personnel have access to restricted areas

 

Source: SEC Issues Report on Brokerage Firms’ Handling of Confidential Information (SEC Release 2012-200)

This alert applies to the Series 24, Series 26, Series 6, Series 7, Series 55, Series 62, Series 79, Series 82, Series 99, Series 63, Series 65, Series 66, and Series 56.

Study Question of the Week: October 10, 2012 Edition

This week’s study question from the Solomon Online Exam Simulator question database is now available (Relevant to the Series 7, Series 65, Series 66, Series 24 and Series 62). Be sure to submit your answers in the comments section and check back tomorrow for the correct answer and rationale. Continue reading

This week’s study question from the Solomon Online Exam Simulator question database is now available. Be sure to submit your answers in the comments section and check back tomorrow for the correct answer and rationale. Happy studying!

Question (Relevant to the Series 7, Series 65, Series 66, Series 24 and Series 62):

Todd finally hit the nail on the head when he sold short shares of Widget Corporation. He doesn’t see widgets coming around anytime soon, but would like to protect his profits in case the stock goes against him. What type of order would Todd most likely enter?

Answers:

A: Buy stop

B: Sell Stop

C: Market

D: FOK

 

Answer found here.

I will help you pass your licensing exam . . . What am I?

Willing to try anything to pass your securities exam? Here’s a tip you may want to consider! Continue reading

I’m a walnut!

If you’re looking for an edge on an upcoming securities exam, you may want to chow down on a couple of walnuts prior to your test.  A recent study suggests that walnut consumption provides a boost in cognitive brain functions. That said, you may want to think twice before adding this tactic to your study strategy. Students involved in the study were asked to consume one-half cup of walnuts, daily, for eight weeks—that’s a whole lot of walnuts!

 

A recent study finds that consumption of walnuts improves critical thinking.

 

At Solomon, we know the sure fire way to a first-time pass is through structured study—reading, testing, instruction and practice! That’s why our first-time pass rate (89.5%) is consistently strong.  Solomon’s study materials consist of exam study guides, online exam simulators, audiobooks, online video lectures, online study courses, workbooks and mobile apps and are designed to engage both the financial services novice and expert to ensure absorption of exam topics and application of those concepts within a testing environment. The authors of the materials and instructors of the courses bring a wealth of industry knowledge, as well as a deep understanding of adult learning strategies, the latter setting Solomon Exam Prep apart for other securities exam prep companies.

We also understand that every little bit helps. So, let us give you a nut! Use coupon code WALNUT15 upon your next purchase to receive 15% off individual study materials (Not applicable to study packages. Expires 12/31/2012).

Happy studying!

ANSWER–Study Question of the Week: October 1, 2012 Edition

As a follow up to yesterday’s licensing exam study question (Relevant to Series 65, Series 66, Series 7, and Series 79), here is your question PLUS answer and rationale: Continue reading

As a follow up to yesterday’s licensing exam study question, here is your question PLUS answer and rationale:

Question (Relevant to Series 65, Series 66, Series 7, and Series 79):

Given the following assumptions for stock ABC, what is its expected return using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)?

Assumptions: Risk Free Rate: 1%; Expected Return on general stock market: 7%; Beta: 1.; Sharpe Ratio: 2.

Answers:

A. 10%

B. 13%

C. 11.5%

D. 15%

Correct Answer: A

Rationale: The formula for the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is given by the following: Return on Stock = Risk Free Rate + Beta of Stock x (Return on Market – Risk Free Rate). Plugging in for Stock ABC gives Return on Stock ABC = 1% + 1.5 x (7% – 1%) = 10%. Note the Sharpe Ratio is not used in the CAPM formula.

*Questions featured in the weekly study question series are sampled from Solomon’s industry-leading Online Exam Simulator.

Exam Alert: MSRB requires price or yield information to accompany “NRO” designations

Effective November 1, 2012, the MSRB will prohibit broker-dealers from using the designation “not reoffered” or “NRO” in written communications about new issues of municipal securities, unless the broker-dealers include price or yield information on the securities. Continue reading

Effective November 1, 2012, the MSRB will prohibit broker-dealers from using the designation “not reoffered” or “NRO” in written communications about new issues of municipal securities, unless the broker-dealers include price or yield information on the securities.  This rule applies to any written communication sent at or after the time a municipal issuer accepts an underwriter’s terms for a new issue.

The designation “NRO” or “not reoffered” means that certain maturities of a new issue of municipal securities are not available to be reoffered to potential investors.  This occurs when the maturities are fully subscribed for or sold prior to the general reoffering of the issue.

Sources:

MSRB Receives Approval to Improve Price Transparency for “Not Reoffered” Municipal Securities

Glossary of Municipal Securities Terms

This alert applies to the Series 7.

Study Question of the Week: October 1, 2012 Edition

This week’s study question from the Solomon Online Exam Simulator question database is now available (Relevant to Series 65, Series 66, Series 7, and Series 79). Be sure to submit your answers in the comments section and check back tomorrow for the correct answer and rationale! Continue reading

This week’s study question from the Solomon Online Exam Simulator question database is now available. Be sure to submit your answers in the comments section and check back tomorrow for the correct answer and rationale!

Happy studying!

Question (Relevant to Series 65, Series 66, Series 7, and Series 79): Given the following assumptions for stock ABC, what is its expected return using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)?

Risk Free Rate: 1%; Expected Return on general stock market: 7%; Beta: 1.;, Sharpe Ratio: 2.

Answers:

A. 10%

B. 13%

C. 11.5%

D. 15%

Exam alert: SEC issues risk alert on “Pay-to-Play” practices

On August 31, 2012, the SEC issued a risk alert regarding compliance with MSRB rules. Specifically, the alert looks at failures to comply with Rule G-37, which prohibits a firm from doing business with a municipal issuer if a municipal finance professional of the firm donated money to an official of that issuer within the past two years. Continue reading

On August 31, 2012, the SEC issued a risk alert regarding compliance with MSRB rules.  Specifically, the alert looks at failures to comply with Rule G-37, which prohibits a firm from doing business with a municipal issuer if a municipal finance professional of the firm donated money to an official of that issuer within the past two years.  The alert expresses concerns about violations of the ban, as well as inadequate supervision, failure to file forms, and recordkeeping violations.

The alert identifies good practices implemented by brokers to ensure compliance with the rule.  These practices include training programs for municipal finance professionals, self-certification of compliance with the rule, surveillance of unreported political contributions, and restriction on political contributions (when permitted by state or local law).

Source: SEC Issues Risk Alert on “Pay-to-Play” Prohibitions Under MSRB Rules (SEC Release 2012-173)

This alert applies to the Series 24, Series 7, and Series 99.

ANSWER–Study Question of the Week: September 19, 2012 Edition

As a follow up to yesterday’s licensing exam study question, here is your question PLUS answer and rationale (Relevant to Series 7, Series 79, Series 24, Series 62, Series 99, and Series 82). Continue reading

As a follow up to yesterday’s licensing exam study question, here is your question PLUS answer and rationale:

Question (Relevant to Series 7, Series 79, Series 24, Series 62, Series 99, and Series 82):

Before allowing a customer to buy shares in an IPO, the member firm must receive a representation that the account is not restricted by the account owner. How can this form be obtained initially?
I. Negative consent letter
II. Positive affirmation letter

Answers:

A: I

B: II

C: Either I or II

D: Neither I nor II

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: Before allowing a customer to buy shares in an IPO, the member firm must receive a representation declaring that the account is not restricted by the account owner. The firm must receive a positive affirmation letter in which the customer states in writing that the account is not restricted. After the initial verification is obtained, annual verifications may be obtained through a negative consent letter. A negative consent letter is a letter that states that the person is not restricted unless they inform the firm otherwise.

*Questions featured in the weekly study question series are sampled from Solomon’s industry-leading Online Exam Simulator.

Study Question of the Week: September 19, 2012 Edition

This week’s study question from the Solomon Online Exam Simulator question database is now available. Be sure to submit your answers in the comments section and check back tomorrow for the correct answer and rationale! Continue reading

This week’s study question from the Solomon Online Exam Simulator question database is now available. Be sure to submit your answers in the comments section and check back tomorrow for the correct answer and rationale!

Happy studying!

Question (Relevant to Series 7, Series 79, Series 24, Series 62, Series 99, and Series 82):

Before allowing a customer to buy shares in an IPO, the member firm must receive a representation that the account is not restricted by the account owner. How can this form be obtained initially?
I. Negative consent letter
II. Positive affirmation letter

Answers:

A: I

B: II

C: Either I or II

D: Neither I nor II

Securities Licensing Examination Waivers

FINRA is permitted to waive the examinations in “exceptional cases and where good cause is shown.” Continue reading

FINRA is permitted to waive the examinations in “exceptional cases and where good cause is shown.”  Related experience, education, regulatory experience, registration filing errors and related exams may be grounds for waiver requests. Age and/or physical infirmity are factors FINRA may consider but Rule 1070(d) says that age and/or illness alone are not sufficient ground.  English as a second language is not considered grounds for a waiver, but ESL candidates can request additional time (30-60) minutes to take an exam.  Principal examinations, such as the Series 24 General Securities Principal Exam and the Series 26 Investment Company Products/Variable Contracts Limited Principal Exam, are “rarely waived.”  Also, if you’re talking NASAA exams (Series 63, 65, 66) you have to go to the state to request a waiver, not FINRA.  Finally, examination waiver requests must be submitted by the firm, not the applicant, electronically via Firm Gateway and they “are conditional on the applicant successfully completing a Regulatory Element training session pursuant to FINRA Continuing Education Rule 1250.”

Relevant to: Series 7, Series 6, Series 24, Series 26, Series 55, Series 79, Series 99, Series 82.