Exam Alert: FINRA clarifies maintenance margin requirements for non-margin eligible equity securities

FINRA has clarified what the customer maintenance margin requirements are for equity securities that are not considered margin securities under Continue reading

FINRA has clarified what the customer maintenance margin requirements are for equity securities that are not considered margin securities under Regulation T.  The FINRA notice also clarifies that the maintenance loan value of non-margin eligible equity securities may only be applied to a maintenance margin deficiency, and cannot be used for additional transactions or withdrawals.  Firms have until July 1, 2011, to comply with these requirements. Relevant to the Series 7, Series 62 and Series 24 exams.

http://www.finra.org/Industry/Regulation/Notices/2011/P123451

Exam Alert: Proposed FINRA rule will clarify firms’ supervisory responsibilities for outsourced activities

On March 29, 2011, FINRA requested comment on proposed FINRA Rule 3190. The proposed rule makes it clear that when a firm outsources a function or Continue reading

On March 29, 2011, FINRA requested comment on proposed FINRA Rule 3190.  The proposed rule makes it clear that when a firm outsources a function or activity to a third party, the firm is still responsible for complying with applicable securities law and FINRA and MSRB rules.  This responsibility cannot be delegated to another party.  Firms will also be required to have supervisory procedures in place to ensure compliance with the rule.

http://www.finra.org/Industry/Regulation/Notices/2011/P123399

Exam Alert: IRS requires broker-dealers and mutual funds to report cost basis of stocks

Effective January 1, 2011, the IRS requires that when broker-dealers and mutual funds purchase stocks, the cost basis of the stocks must be reported to Continue reading

Effective January 1, 2011, the IRS requires that when broker-dealers and mutual funds purchase stocks, the cost basis of the stocks must be reported to the IRS and to investors.  In 2011, this reporting requirement only applies to most stocks, while in 2012 and beyond, the requirement will apply to all stocks.  In 2011, the rule will not apply to mutual fund shares and shares purchased via dividend reinvestment plans. Relevant to the Series 6, Series 7, Series 62, Series 65, and Series 66 exams.

IRS news release: http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=228907,00.html

Analysis by the Securities Technology Monitor: http://www.securitiestechnologymonitor.com/photo_gallery/1_36/27400-1.html

Exam Alert: proposed exam for Operations Professionals will focus on basics

On March 4, 2011, FINRA filed documents with the SEC that describe the content covered by the proposed exam for Operations Professionals. The exam will focus Continue reading

On March 4, 2011, FINRA filed documents with the SEC that describe the content covered by the proposed exam for Operations Professionals.  The exam will focus on ethics and basic knowledge of the securities industry regarding products, markets, and broker-dealer activities.  An Operations Professional would not be held to the same standard of knowledge about a product as a product specialist or representative selling the product.

FINRA rule filing: http://www.finra.org/Industry/Regulation/RuleFilings/2011/P123267

Analysis by the Securities Technology Monitor: http://www.securitiestechnologymonitor.com/news/-27324-1.html

Exam Alert: FINRA further revises its Sanction Guidelines

Effective March 22, 2011, FINRA has revised its Sanction Guidelines to reflect recent developments in FINRA disciplinary cases. The specific revisions: Continue reading

Effective March 22, 2011, FINRA has revised its Sanction Guidelines to reflect recent developments in FINRA disciplinary cases.  The specific revisions:

-clarify the standards required for an order of restitution (repayment)

-recognize that adjudicators may order that ill-gotten gains be paid to the injured party (as opposed to being taken by FINRA as a fine)

-acknowledge that whether a factor is aggravating or mitigating depends on the circumstances of the case

-direct adjudicators to consider sanctions already imposed by other regulators for the same misconduct to see if those sanctions were “sufficiently remedial”

http://www.finra.org/Industry/Regulation/Notices/2011/P123374

http://www.finra.org/Industry/Regulation/Notices/2011/P123374

Exam Alert: SEC proposes amendment requiring broker-dealers to search for missing securityholders

On March 18, 2011, the SEC proposed an amendment to Rule 17Ad-17, which currently requires transfer agents to look for Continue reading

On March 18, 2011, the SEC proposed an amendment to Rule 17Ad-17, which currently requires transfer agents to look for missing holders of securities.  The amendment would extend this obligation to broker-dealers.  Two database searches are required: the first one must occur three to twelve months after the securityholder becomes lost, and the second one must take place six to twelve months after the first search.

http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2011/34-64099.pdf

Exam Alert: FINRA proposes rule requiring Operations Professionals to register

On March 4, 2011, FINRA filed a proposed rule with the SEC that would require that persons who are both “covered persons” and who perform “covered functions” Continue reading

On March 4, 2011, FINRA filed a proposed rule with the SEC that would require that persons who are both “covered persons” and who perform “covered functions” register as “Operations Professionals.”  Operations Professional is a new category of registration that is subject to FINRA’s qualifying exams and continuing education requirements.  Essentially, covered persons are those with control over what work takes place, how a member’s money is materially spent, and what material agreements the member is entered into.  The list of covered functions is fairly broad, covering many broker-dealer activities.

http://www.finra.org/Industry/Regulation/RuleFilings/2011/P123267

Exam Alert: SEC proposes rule to eliminate credit rating as a condition for short-form securities registration

On February 9, 2011, the SEC voted unanimously to propose an amendment to its rules that would remove credit ratings as a condition Continue reading

On February 9, 2011, the SEC voted unanimously to propose an amendment to its rules that would remove credit ratings as a condition for registration of securities using short-form registration or shelf registration.  Instead of a credit rating qualification, the issuer must have issued $1 billion of non-convertible securities in the past three years.  This proposed change is part of the Dodd-Frank Act reforms, which among other things require that federal agencies remove references to credit ratings from their rules. Relevant to the Series 79, the Series 24 and the Series 62.

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2011/2011-41.htm

Exam Alert: FINRA reinstitutes short sale exempt marking on trade reports

Effective February 28, 2011, FINRA has reinstituted the “short sale exempt” marking for trade reporting in over-the-counter transactions. In addition, Continue reading

Effective February 28, 2011, FINRA has reinstituted the “short sale exempt” marking for trade reporting in over-the-counter transactions.  In addition, Order Audit Trail System (OATS) route reports must include, if applicable, price and a short exempt identifier.  “Short sale exempt” indicators are used for short sales of stocks that may be marked “short exempt” under Regulation SHO. Relevant to the Series 7, Series 62 and Series 24 exams.

http://www.finra.org/Industry/Regulation/Notices/2010/P122255

The types of sales that qualify as short exempt may be found under Rules 201(c) and 201(d) of Regulation SHO: http://taft.law.uc.edu/CCL/regSHO/rule201.html#c.

Exam Alert: FINRA revises its Sanction Guidelines

Effective February 9, 2011, FINRA has modified its Sanction Guidelines. These changes incorporate legal precedent from federal courts and the SEC. Continue reading

Effective February 9, 2011, FINRA has modified its Sanction Guidelines.  These changes incorporate legal precedent from federal courts and the SEC.  The degree of penalties for certain offenses have changed, such as recommending higher fines and firm suspension for “egregious” sales of unregistered securities, particularly in connection with market manipulation.  The guidelines for FINRA Rule 8210 now have three categories of violations.  Additional details may be found here: http://www.finra.org/Industry/Regulation/Notices/2011/P122910.